
The Chinese government has deployed 150k troops to the North Korean border to prepare for a strike from the United States following the missile airstrikes against Syria last week.
China has now dispatched troops from the People's Liberation Army forces to the Yalu River in anticipation of pre-emptive attacks as the US Navy moves the USS Carl Vinson aircraft carrier strike group from Singapore to North Korea.
According to reports from Korea's Chosun.com, The troops have been dispatched to handle North Korean refugees and "unforeseen circumstances", such as the prospect of preemptive attacks on North Korea, the news agency said.
The Daily Mail reports: China's top nuclear envoy arrived in Seoul Monday for talks on the North Korean threat, as the United States sent the naval strike group to the region and signaled it may act to shut down Pyongyang's weapons program.
Speculation of an imminent nuclear test
is brewing as the North marks major anniversaries including the 105th
birthday of its founding leader on Saturday - sometimes celebrated with a
demonstration of military might.
Wu Dawei, China's Special Representative
for Korean Peninsula Affairs, met with his South Korean counterpart on
Monday to discuss the nuclear issue.
The talks come shortly after Trump
hosted Chinese leader Xi Jinping for a summit at which he pressed
Pyongyang's key ally to do more to curb the North's nuclear ambitions.
'(We) are prepared to chart our own
course if this is something China is just unable to coordinate with us,'
US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said after the summit.
He added however that Beijing had indicated a willingness to act on the issue.
'We need to allow them time to take
actions,' Tillerson said, adding that Washington had no intention of
attempting to remove the regime of Kim Jong-Un.
The meeting between Xi and Trump came on
the heels of yet another missile test by the North, which fired a
medium-range ballistic missile into the Sea of Japan on Wednesday.
The US Navy strike group Carl Vinson
canceled a planned trip to Australia this weekend, heading toward the
Korean peninsula instead, in a move that will raise tensions in the
region.

Seoul and Washington are also conducting
joint military drills, an annual exercise which is seen by the North as
a practice for war.
Pyongyang is on a quest to develop a
long-range missile capable of hitting the US mainland with a nuclear
warhead and has so far staged five nuclear tests, two of them last year.
Satellite imagery analysis suggests it
could be preparing for a sixth, with US intelligence officials warning
that Pyongyang could be less than two years away from its goal of
striking the continental United States.
China, the US, South Korea and Japan all
have dedicated envoys who meet at regular intervals to discuss the
North Korean issue: a legacy of the long-stalled six-party process that
also involved Pyongyang and Moscow. The North quit the negotiations in
2009.
The isolated North is barred under UN
resolutions from any use of ballistic missile technology, but repeated
rounds of sanctions have failed to arrest its nuclear ambitions.
Trump has previously threatened
unilateral action against the reclusive state, a threat that appeared
more palpable after Thursday's strike on a Syrian airfield following an
apparent chemical attack.
US National Security Adviser HR McMaster
on Sunday criticized North Korea as a rogue nation engaged in
provocative behavior and said denuclearisation of the peninsula 'must
happen'.
'The president has asked them to be
prepared to give us a full range of options to remove that threat,' he
said on Fox News, apparently referring to Trump's advisers.
South Korea's Unification Minister Hong Yong-Pyo said Monday the repercussions of a potential military response were worrying.
'Pre-emptive strikes may be aimed at
resolving North Korea's nuclear problems, but for us, it is also related
to defending the safety of the public,' he told reporters.
While a US unilateral strike on North
Korea from a shorter range might be more effective, it would likely
endanger many civilians in the South and risk triggering a broader
military conflict, experts warn.
'The US has always had all the options
on the table from a preventive strike to preemptive strike to
negotiations,' said James Kim, an analyst at Seoul-based Asan Institute
for Policy Studies.
'If it's a preventive strike or
precision strike, there's a danger that this could expand into a broader
regional conflict involving China or Japan.
'The upside is that the United States
may be able to denuclearise the North by force.... but it will come at a
huge cost to the region and to the United States,' he told AFP.
0 comments:
Post a comment